<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Gender on SIII OCULI</title>
    <link>https://siiioculi.lilxbrxaker.com/zh/tags/gender/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Gender on SIII OCULI</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.157.0</generator>
    <language>zh</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:26:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://siiioculi.lilxbrxaker.com/zh/tags/gender/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>逻辑案例：如果一种性别更容易被社会工程化，他们仍应被允许投票吗？</title>
      <link>https://siiioculi.lilxbrxaker.com/zh/posts/the-logical-case-if-one-gender-is-more-easily-socially-engineered-should-they-still-be-allowed-to-vote/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://siiioculi.lilxbrxaker.com/zh/posts/the-logical-case-if-one-gender-is-more-easily-socially-engineered-should-they-still-be-allowed-to-vote/</guid>
      <description>这里有一个2026年没人愿意大声说出的不舒服真相：如果一种性别始终表现出易受影响的明确、可测量的模式……</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
